It seems like every day there is a new article or hypothesis about corporate boards and governance. Diversity…Say on Pay…Proxy Access…Tenure. You name it, it’s been debated.
A new Ernst and Young study takes on the topic of board member skills, or more specifically providing more disclosure to investors about the skills and experience of board members. According to Ernst and Young, “Investors increasingly seek confirmation that boards have the skill sets and expertise needed to provide strategic counsel and oversee key risks facing the company, including environmental and social risks.” Of the 50 institutional investors interviewed, more than three-quarters do not believe companies do enough to explain why they have the right people in the boardroom.
The Wall Street Journal reported that a thorough approach to selecting directors is more important than lower mandatory retirement ages for board members. It only makes sense that investors be more concerned about what each director can bring to the table (pun intended) than how old that director is or how long they have been serving. Although, these issues are also hot buttons for today’s boards.
As we tweeted earlier this week, there are more than 100 proxy access proposals thus far in 2015, up from just 17 last year, signaling that institutional investors want to be part of the process for selecting who will be guiding the companies they own. Fourteen corporations are taking a more proactive approaching by voluntarily agreeing to give investors the ability to nominate their own directors.
It will likely be some time before corporate America turns over the board selection process, but in the meantime, we continue to believe that disclosure and transparency in governance for listed companies are the best way to build and maintain credibility and goodwill.
— Laurie Berman, email@example.com